Are landlord’s deposit taking habits changing? | Ome

April 23, 2020
Press release

Our research revealed the huge sums of tenant money that is estimated as being held by landlords and agents without protection via a deposit protection scheme.

Our sister company, mydeposits, manages 25 per cent of the total deposit protection market and their latest records show they currently protect more than 876,000 live deposits. This suggests there is an estimated 3.5 million deposits protected across the entire market, equating to some £3.9 billion in value!

This means that with 3.5 million protected tenancies to a value of £3.9 billion, the average tenant is paying £1,139 for a tenancy deposit.

We compared these statistics with the latest English Housing Survey report which shows an estimated 4.6 million tenancies in the private rental sector in 2019. With only 3.5 million of these tenancy deposits accounted for in protection schemes, there are potentially 1.1 million tenancies that either have not had a deposit protected, do not have deposits, or are using deposit replacement products. At worst, there could be as much as £1.2 billion in deposit monies that are not protected.

However, the latest report into deposit protection compliance rates by the Center for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) estimates that 14.5 per cent of all deposits held are not protected by landlords or agents. This means of the estimated 1.1 million tenancy deposits that are unaccounted for, just over 500,000 (14.5 per cent) cash deposits could currently be unprotected, putting £578 million at risk.

This would however suggest there are still some 586,000 tenancies in the private rental sector that are neither compliant nor unprotected, suggesting a growing preference amongst landlords to ditch the traditional cash deposit.

Landlord’s deposit taking habits are changing

This could be explained by two factors: firstly the increased acceptance of deposit replacement products such as our Deposit Replacement Membership and, secondly, some landlords opting to request no deposit at all, with our latest research showing as many as 600,000 tenancies in the private rental sector currently opting for one of these two options.

The lack of a rental deposit is already a theme becoming popular with “Build-to-rent” providers who operate large numbers of rental units and forgo a traditional deposit, mitigating the risk by providing additional complimentary services such as cleaning to their tenants.

As the industry becomes more service-orientated and changes to legislation lead to tenants receiving more consumer protection, landlords and agents are looking at ways in which they can streamline their businesses, with innovation in the deposit sector looking to be fertile ground.

But for those 500,000 landlords across the nation that have taken a deposit and failed to place it in a compliant protection scheme, there are consequences. They run the risk of fines of up to three times the deposit plus the deposit itself. At £1,139 for the average new deposit, it could cost up to £4,556 per unprotected deposit!

Our Co-Founder, Matthew Hooker, commented:

“The reality is that the private rental sector is changing and has been changing gradually through the formal introduction of deposit protection in 2006 and the subsequent launch of the more traditional protection schemes.
It’s impossible to tell just how many deposits are still sat unprotected in the bank accounts of either rogue landlords or agents but based on market data, we can make a conservative estimate that this total value runs into the hundreds of millions of pounds.
We would always advise tenants to check which deposit protection scheme your agent or landlord is part of and to make sure they give you the documentation confirming the deposit is protected.
For landlords and agents that would rather not have to worry about the often arduous and risky process of managing a deposit, we would recommend looking at products such as our own Deposit Replacement Membership rather than hoping they don’t get caught out. It removes the need to take cash deposits but keeps you protected should the worst happen.”